Iranian foreign interference plot disrupted
Daniel Hurst
Australian security agencies have shut down a foreign interference plot by Iran, the Australian government has said. The plot allegedly included individuals conducting surveillance of the home of an Iranian-Australian and extensively researching this person and their family.
The home affairs minister, Clare O’Neil, revealed the incident in a speech to the Australian National University today while saying a number of diaspora communities in Australia face pressure when they peacefully protest about the actions of their governments back at home.
O’Neil also described foreign interference as “one of the core threats our democracy faces”. She vowed to “bring foreign interference out of the shadows, and into the light” so that people can be ready to face the challenge.
O’Neil told the ANU’s National Security College this morning:
Today I want to speak in more detail about foreign interference from one country in particular: Iran. I stress that foreign interference does not just come from one country – it is being conducted and directed by many countries across the globe. Iran is but one of them.
Since September last year, Iran’s theocratic regime has been jolted by nation-wide protests in response to the tragic death in police custody of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini, Kurdish name “Jina”.
Tehran’s brutal response to those protests – with more than 400 people killed, including at least 50 children – has not only failed to quell the uprising, but triggered further protests against the regime around the world, including here in Australia.
Obviously, Tehran’s response to protests could not be farther than our own. In our country, we respect the right of Australians to peacefully express their views … it is perfectly legal for anyone in Australia to criticise a foreign regime, as tens of thousands of people across the country have been doing in response to events in Iran.
What we absolutely will not tolerate, under any circumstances, are attempts by foreign regimes to disrupt peaceful protests, encourage violence or suppress views. Nor will we tolerate hostile acts in the form of surveillance, harassment or intimidation against individuals or family members here in Australia.
The Australian government and our security agencies will act to protect Australians and their democratic rights.
Late last year, Asio disrupted the activities of individuals who had conducted surveillance of the home of an Iranian-Australian, as well as extensive research of this individual and their family. I’m pleased to say our agencies were onto it like a shot. Asio tracked the operation and shut it down immediately.
We’re not going to stand back and have Australians or indeed visitors to our country watched and tracked by foreign governments on our soil. This is Australia, this is our democracy, and if you engage in activities like this, you will be discovered.
To those states who operate in the shadows, I have a simple message – we are watching you. Where our national interest is served by calling out your operations, we will. And to those in Australia making their voice heard, we are acting to protect you.
Key events
Filters BETA
Turnbull: argument to vote for a voice backed by few details may seem like a ‘blank check’ for voters
Speaking of former PMs, here is a little bit more from Malcolm Turnbull’s interview on ABC Radio RN Breakfast this morning.
While prime minister, Turnbull’s cabinet rejected the proposal from the Uluru Statement from the Heart and said it “would inevitably become seen as a third chamber of parliament”. Here’s a piece from back then:
That wasn’t true (the voice isn’t and never has been a third chamber of the parliament) and Turnbull has since said he will be voting yes:
He reiterated he would be voting yes on Tuesday’s program, but asked whether or not the government needed to provide “more detail” as Peter Dutton is demanding, Turnbull said:
In terms of providing detail, the the difficulty is that Albanese can’t provide it, right, because he basically needs Indigenous Australians to to design … the voice themselves and that obviously has to be you know, approved and legislated by the parliament.
Now … in a sense, it’s too late to provide detail. And, you know, pointing to Marcia Langton and Tom Calma’s report is ridiculous with great respect.
I mean, it’s a great report, but it hasn’t been adopted, it’s 300 pages long, it’s a very good work, but it is not government policy.
So I think the the government is sort of stuck with the position they’re in and there is a very sincere, calculated, intelligent, informed view among the yes campaign that the more detail you have, the more likely it is it’ll go down.
But having said that, when people say we want to know what we’re voting for, it is a pretty reasonable request, so it isn’t … changing the constitution isn’t easy.
They’ve taken a course of action, elected on one, which says no detail, just vote for the heart of, the generosity of spirit if you like, vote … on the principle – that will sway a lot of people, but others will say, I think this sounds like a bit like a blank check.
So that’s the challenge.
A blog watcher has spotted former prime minister Kevin Rudd in the parliament.
As the incoming ambassador to the US, there are all sorts of briefings he needs to receive, although it is also not unusual for former PMs to drop by parliament when they are in town.
Amy Remeikis
February 14 is also the date Captain Cook was killed in Hawaii, but you won’t see politicians make social media videos about that.
Daniel Hurst
O’Neil: foreign governments are attempting to exert influence over diaspora communities
In her speech about foreign interference, Clare O’Neil vowed to “call out the egregious acts of individual countries when it is in the national interest to do so”.
The home affairs minister told the ANU she wanted “a public discussion about this problem that is open, apolitical and commensurate with the size of the challenge – and to build a community of people who know what foreign interference is, what it looks like, and what to do when they see it”.
Our best defence against foreign interference is to arm people who are possible targets of this behaviour with the information they need to recognise and report it. And partisanship is a problem because if this discussion becomes polluted by craven political interests, our citizens will lose trust with our attempts to explain it.
We must change the nature and tone of the discussion.
While Iran was the only country she named explicitly in today’s speech, O’Neil said the anecdote about the disrupted plot was “not the only story of Asio detecting foreign interference in Australia”. She said there were other examples “of foreign governments tasking human sources to collect sensitive personal information of individuals seen as dissidents by the foreign government due to their activism” and “individuals arranging counter-protests to instigate arguments with activists with the intent of provoking violence – all at the request of a foreign intelligence service”:
So when and where do we see this problem most commonly in Australia?
We see it in the covert influence foreign governments attempt to exert over diaspora communities. To be clear, this is almost always unsuccessful due to the deep loyalty of Australia’s migrant communities to our beautiful shared country.
We see it when diaspora communities peacefully protest about the actions of their governments back at home. In some instances, they will be photographed, harassed or followed as a result. We see it when members of those communities speak out publicly against violence or intimidation in their home country. We see it when people in those communities or their families back home are threatened, harassed or intimidated. To be clear, this type of foreign interference is commonplace, it is happening around our country every day.
We see it too, on social media, where foreign governments covertly try to sow division around political issues that are felt deeply in the Australian community, to deliberately deteriorate our social fabric and cause conflict and painful rifts.
We see it in our universities, where foreign governments attempt to covertly influence how topics are discussed and covered in our fiercely independent university lecture theatres.
We see in politics, where foreign governments try to win over elected leaders and party activists push for changes in everything from planning laws to foreign and national security policy, or simply to build a picture of how decisions are made.
Liberals step up attacks on Labor border protection policy
The deputy Liberal leader, Sussan Ley, was out and about early today with this message:
There are two absolute truths you know about a Labor government. Australians know they will always pay more under Labor and Labor does not have what it takes to keep our borders safe.
The concerning information that’s come out of Senate estimates about the dismantling of temporary protection visas should concern every Australian … We’ve seen this movie before. I was in the parliament in 2008 when Kevin Rudd did exactly this, dismantled our border protection, and the result was absolutely horrific. Australians saw that and they don’t want to go back there.
This Labor government does not have the heart to understand the importance of keeping our borders safe. So let’s see how Anthony Albanese responds to this issue today, but it is incredibly important.
Except the boss of home affairs, Mike Pezzullo, said Labor did not act against advice. He was very clear in saying that reports that Labor had were “not correct”. And yes, the Rudd government did get rid of TPVs in 2008. But it also stopped naval (boat) turnbacks at the time, which is the key difference – boat turnbacks will continue under the current Labor policy.
It’s something that the opposition has been leaving out of its attacks: it has been referencing 2008, but leaving out key points. Boat turnbacks remain Labor policy this time around.
Iranian foreign interference plot disrupted
Daniel Hurst
Australian security agencies have shut down a foreign interference plot by Iran, the Australian government has said. The plot allegedly included individuals conducting surveillance of the home of an Iranian-Australian and extensively researching this person and their family.
The home affairs minister, Clare O’Neil, revealed the incident in a speech to the Australian National University today while saying a number of diaspora communities in Australia face pressure when they peacefully protest about the actions of their governments back at home.
O’Neil also described foreign interference as “one of the core threats our democracy faces”. She vowed to “bring foreign interference out of the shadows, and into the light” so that people can be ready to face the challenge.
O’Neil told the ANU’s National Security College this morning:
Today I want to speak in more detail about foreign interference from one country in particular: Iran. I stress that foreign interference does not just come from one country – it is being conducted and directed by many countries across the globe. Iran is but one of them.
Since September last year, Iran’s theocratic regime has been jolted by nation-wide protests in response to the tragic death in police custody of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini, Kurdish name “Jina”.
Tehran’s brutal response to those protests – with more than 400 people killed, including at least 50 children – has not only failed to quell the uprising, but triggered further protests against the regime around the world, including here in Australia.
Obviously, Tehran’s response to protests could not be farther than our own. In our country, we respect the right of Australians to peacefully express their views … it is perfectly legal for anyone in Australia to criticise a foreign regime, as tens of thousands of people across the country have been doing in response to events in Iran.
What we absolutely will not tolerate, under any circumstances, are attempts by foreign regimes to disrupt peaceful protests, encourage violence or suppress views. Nor will we tolerate hostile acts in the form of surveillance, harassment or intimidation against individuals or family members here in Australia.
The Australian government and our security agencies will act to protect Australians and their democratic rights.
Late last year, Asio disrupted the activities of individuals who had conducted surveillance of the home of an Iranian-Australian, as well as extensive research of this individual and their family. I’m pleased to say our agencies were onto it like a shot. Asio tracked the operation and shut it down immediately.
We’re not going to stand back and have Australians or indeed visitors to our country watched and tracked by foreign governments on our soil. This is Australia, this is our democracy, and if you engage in activities like this, you will be discovered.
To those states who operate in the shadows, I have a simple message – we are watching you. Where our national interest is served by calling out your operations, we will. And to those in Australia making their voice heard, we are acting to protect you.
David Pocock launches 3,000km Heart 2 Heart charity walk
Happy Valentine’s day to those who observe, or just wanted to hear it.
The independent ACT senator David Pocock is using the day to host the launch of a new charity walk – Heart 2 Heart – to raise money and awareness for first responder mental health research and inititives.
The Heart 2 Heart Walk is a 3,000km charity walk linking Lambert Centre of Australia in the Northern Territory (Heart of Country) to Australia’s Parliament House in Canberra (Heart of Nation) aiming to draw attention to challenges around First Responder mental health and wellbeing.
It’s also about trying to bring about more progress on the recommendations made in the 2019 The people behind 000: mental health of our first responders Senate inquiry report.
The Heart 2 Heart Foundation is coordinating the walk and wants the government to enact the recommendations, including a national action plan on first responder mental health, a national register of health professionals who specialise in mental health for first responders and support for those who have retired.
I am once again asking political parties to please stop.
The agenda for today
It is round two for the committees we heard from yesterday.
So that means legal and constitutional affairs, where today the attorney general portfolio will be examined and no doubt Michaelia Cash will pop up with some questions there.
Over in finance and public administration, the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet is still under question, but then finance will get a go.
The environment and communications committee is all about arts and comms today which also means it is ABC day. But that section hasn’t been the same since Eric Abetz didn’t get preselected.
And then there is rural and regional affairs (and transport) where the agriculture department will be questioned. Bridget McKenzie will be living her best life.
Amy Remeikis
Senate estimates will continue today, but the House of Representatives is going to be a little bit slower because of all the party room meetings which will be going on, for those wondering.
Labor visa changes not done against advice: government
Home affairs boss Mike Pezzullo confirmed in Senate estimates overnight that Labor’s change to temporary protection visas was not done against advice.
There were reports that Labor had acted contrary to advice from the department which had been given in its incoming brief (an incoming brief is something all new governments/ministers get, which give an update on what is going on in the department, operations and that sort of thing).
They are mostly redacted when you ask for them under freedom of information, so it was hard to tell what the department had told the Labor government. But Pezzullo had no such qualms in saying what was what.
Discussion about this post