Attorneys for Justin Baldoni said in a court filing that Taylor Swift agreed to be deposed in the ongoing civil litigation between It Ends With Us co-stars Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni but Swift’s attorneys dispute that she ever agreed to sit for a deposition.
In a letter to the court from Baldoni’s legal team, filed Thursday, they wrote that Swift has agreed to be deposed in the case but was unable to do so prior to October 20, due to prior professional commitments. (Swift’s 12th studio album, The Life of a Showgirl, is set to be released on October 3.)
But in a letter to the court in response, dated Friday and obtained by CNN, an attorney for Swift said she had not agreed to be deposed and would only do so if required by the court.
“Since the inception of this matter we have consistently maintained that my client has no material role in this action,” an attorney for Swift wrote.
READ MORE: The lawsuit was dismissed, but A-lister’s legal war isn’t over yet
“Further, my client did not agree to a deposition, but if she is forced into a deposition, we advised (after first hearing about the deposition just three days ago) that her schedule would accommodate the time required during the week of October 20 if the parties were able to work out their disputes,” Swift’s filing states. “We take no role in those disputes.”
CNN has reached out to a representative for Swift for further comment.
READ MORE: Liam Hemsworth and Gabriella Brooks announce their engagement
In a separate court document, also dated Friday and obtained by CNN, Lively’s attorneys suggested Baldoni’s legal team was seeking media attention for the case by referencing Swift.
“The Wayfarer Defendants have repeatedly sought to bring Ms. Swift into this litigation to fuel their relentless media strategy. In this latest effort, the Wayfarer Defendants assert – though, notably, without evidence – that Ms. Swift has supposedly ‘agreed’ to sit for a deposition sometime between October 20-25,” the filing from Lively’s legal team states.
“The Wayfarer Defendants do not appear to have contacted Ms. Swift’s counsel regarding a date or location about the deposition until earlier this week. In this respect, the Wayfarer Defendants’ lack of diligence, and disrespect for Ms. Swift’s privacy and schedule, is astounding.”
CNN has reached out to Lively and Baldoni’s representatives for additional comment, beyond their court filings.
For a daily dose of 9honey, subscribe to our newsletter here.
While Baldoni’s suit against Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds was dismissed, Lively is still pursuing her claims of sexual harassment and retaliation against Baldoni.
Swift – a longtime friend of Lively’s – was first mentioned in connection to the dispute when text exchanges were revealed to include the name “Taylor” as part of Baldoni’s since-dismissed countersuit.
One of the text messages appeared to show an exchange between Baldoni and Lively about the script for a scene in It Ends With Us.
READ MORE: The best and most iconic musical comebacks in recent years
“I really love what you did. It really does help a lot. Makes it so much more fun and interesting. (And I would have felt that way without Ryan and Taylor),” Baldoni wrote with a wink emoji.
“You really are a talent across the board. Really excited and grateful to do this together.”
Swift received a subpoena in the case in May that was subsequently withdrawn.
“Taylor Swift never set foot on the set of this movie, she was not involved in any casting or creative decisions, she did not score the film, she never saw an edit or made any notes on the film, she did not even see It Ends With Us until weeks after its public release, and was travelling around the globe during 2023 and 2024,” a spokesperson for Swift said at the time.
READ MORE: Sharon Osbourne’s unlikely new hobby after Ozzy’s death
“The connection Taylor had to this film was permitting the use of one song, My Tears Ricochet. Given that her involvement was licensing a song for the film, which 19 other artists also did, this document subpoena is designed to use Taylor Swift’s name to draw public interest by creating tabloid clickbait instead of focusing on the facts of the case,” the spokesperson added.
Trial in the case is set for next spring in federal court in New York.
FOLLOW US ON WHATSAPP HERE: Stay across all the latest in celebrity, lifestyle and opinion via our WhatsApp channel. No comments, no algorithm and nobody can see your private details.
Discussion about this post