What are the odds of two new human rights commissioners holding anti-trans views? Madeleine Chapman ponders the latest appointments.
In a classic comms move, justice minister Paul Goldsmith announced the appointment of three new commissioners to the human rights commission on a Friday afternoon. The roles (chief human rights commissioner, race relations commissioner and equal employment opportunities commissioner) are not minor jobs in this country. Typically, commissioner roles are held by people who have extensive experience in community work and advocacy. They may have particular areas of interest but overall have a strong sense of equity and inclusion in the work they do. They also would all be expected to believe in protecting the human rights of New Zealanders.
Which makes it particularly baffling that two of the three commissioners appointed on Friday have a history of the complete opposite.
Let’s start with our new chief human rights commissioner Stephen Rainbow. Despite his last name and the fact that the press release touted his work of “promoting LBGT rights”, Rainbow has publicly expressed anti-trans views. In 2021, while working at Auckland Transport, Rainbow commented under a post in the Rainbow Auckland Networking Group on Facebook. The post was urging members to sign a petition calling for a ban on conversion therapy. Rainbow commented: “be careful…there’s some elements of the trans agenda being sneakily promoted through this campaign.”
Complaints were made, including from within AT, and an investigation launched. And if you flinched at the word “transphobic” in the headline… believing that there is a scary “trans agenda” behind the criticism of conversion therapy is a literal representation of trans-phobia.
Rainbow is a gay man, and been a vocal advocate for gay marriage as well as a former board member of New Zealand AIDS Foundation (now called the Burnett Foundation). On first glance, Rainbow’s history suggests at the very least a support of the full rainbow community but his comments from not long ago would suggest otherwise.
On a different human rights note, Rainbow has consistently expressed support for Israel while the country decimates Palestine. In January of this year, Rainbow authored an article for the Israel Institute questioning “the left’s” sympathy for Palestinians despite Israel being “one of the most gay-friendly countries in the world”. Such arguments defending Israel’s attacks have been roundly critiqued for being, shall we say, really fucking stupid.
Then there’s Melissa Derby (Ngāti Ranginui), our new race relations commissioner. Derby is a founding member of the Free Speech Union and has also raised eyebrows by sharing posts that were decidedly anti-trans. In 2023, after the trans rights protest in Albert Park, Derby shared a tweet saying the “trans movement” cannot be tolerated in civil society.
Just to be clear, the “trans movement” and “trans agenda” mentioned by our new commissioners is simply trans people existing and living their lives.
In 2020, Derby spoke at an event hosted by anti-trans group Speak Up For Women, the same event cancelled by Massey University amid safety concerns. She opened with a mihi then confusingly followed it with a joke about how apparently “you’re not allowed to criticise anything Māori”. Derby then wasted no time in making her general views known: “As far as points in the oppression Olympics are concerned, I’m always off to a pretty good start, being female with Māori heritage. Although now that people who are biologically men want to compete in our sports teams, my winning streak may be coming to an end.”
In an information booklet published by the Human Rights Commission in June, it is explicitly stated that “trans rights are human rights” before going on the explain that “Under international human rights standards, everyone has the right to be recognised, respected, and participate in public life. You have the right to define your own gender and be free from harm based on your gender.” The booklet suggests contacting the Human Rights Commission with any concerns regarding gender discrimination and the Human Rights Review Tribunal will soon hear its first case of gender discrimination on the basis of being trans.
In June 2023, a global Ipsos survey showed that New Zealanders had the highest level of agreement that transgender people should be protected from discrimination (84%). Which means the vast majority of New Zealanders are at the very least of the view that trans people should be left alone. Of the 16% who disagree, fewer would make it a public stance and even fewer would risk employment to voice such a harmful minority view.
So it’s mighty interesting that two of the highest positions regarding human rights in New Zealand are now held by people who have publicly voiced anti-trans views (among other questionable views). Wow, what are the odds?
This week’s episode of Behind the Story
Anna Rawhiti-Connell knows more about the internet and how it functions than probably any other journalist in New Zealand. And this week she had the perfect subject: Raygun, the Olympic breakdancing competitor from Australia.
Raygun has been many different things since she first revealed herself in the final weekend of the Paris Games. She’s been an icon, an embarrassment, a hero, and now apparently the subject of an investigation. Anna tracked her rise and fall and rise and fall in a deep dive for The Spinoff. We talked about the latest developments and shared some lukewarm takes about New Zealand’s success in Olympic sports.
So what have readers spent the most time reading this week?
Comments of the week
“I was on a local board in the first years of the new city. At that time, along with the enormous effort from staff to maintain professionalism with very limited infrastructure (like phones, desks, computers!), there was a lot of excitement about the new city. Speakers told us that the world was watching the Auckland experiment. Throughout the process of the Auckland Plan and Unitary Plan, people came to meetings expecting something new and responsive.
Sadly, I think the old, clumsy, heavy-handed Council response simply reappeared. Agile, innovative? Digital town hall? Nope. And following the people’s Unitary Plan, along came the Government’s own version that simply trumped what Aucklanders had worked so hard to achieve consensus on.”
— HelgaA
“I was on a benefit during the last National government and it was a hard life.
I had no car, only a single pram to get my two little kids around. Every time I tried to do something to improve my situation I would get told off by WINZ or end up in a worse situation.
What got me off the benefit wasn’t sanctions, tellings off from WINZ case managers, or “ready to work” seminars. What got me off the benefit was living somewhere rent was 1/4 of my benefit, where I didn’t have to worry about buying food and could afford heating. When I could finally take a break from the crushing poverty, I spent my money on self-improvement, networking, and courses that put me in circles with people who weren’t poor which got me a job offer that was my start. You can’t get out of poverty when you’re crushed.”
— Kirsty
Pick up where this leaves off
Sign up for my weekly Saturday newsletter, which includes more handpicked recommended reading, bundled up to arrive in your inbox at 9 a.m.
Discussion about this post