Categories
International

Adam Boulton: ‘Like those old guys on The Muppets’ – bad sign for democracy as Trump and Biden call shots on how they will debate | Politics News

[ad_1]

That was easy. Donald Trump and Joe Biden duelled briefly over the airwaves about debating.

“Any time, any place, anywhere,” the Republican candidate had challenged. “Make my day, pal” the president retorted movie-style.

In just a matter of hours the two men agreed to Joe Biden‘s proposal for two televised presidential debates before the election on 5 November – at CNN HQ in Atlanta on 27 June and on ABC forum on 10 September.

There will be more role-playing between now and the agreed showdowns. Biden has already rejected Trump’s counter-offer of two further debates including one on Fox News.

But once again the US does seem on course to hold debates between the frontrunners for the White House, as it has in most of the presidential cycles since JFK took on Richard Nixon in 1960. The UK has only managed to hold proper equivalent prime ministerial leaders debates in 2010.

The two candidates will confront each other in different circumstances than previously. They will meet earlier in the cycle of the election year and without the usual rules.

Both sides have agreed to cold shoulder the widely respected Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD), which had proposed three debates before mass audiences closer to polling day.

The Republicans and the Democrats have decided that the CPD model is outdated because of the changing nature of campaigning and voting, the evolving demands of the media and above all because of the unique nature of this campaign in which the two main candidates have become clear so early in the year and in which they are the oldest in America’s political history.

“It’ll be entertaining, informative. Like those two old guys on The Muppets,” former Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney quipped to Huffpost.

Pic: Disney/Kobal/Shutterstock
Image:
Pic: Disney/Kobal/Shutterstock

The traditional CPD debates are one of the many norms of US politics which have been subverted by Donald Trump.

According to opinion polls held afterwards as to “who won the debate?”, he is a poor debater.

He “lost” all three of his encounters with Hillary Clinton in 2016 and both of his debates against Biden in 2020.

Biden also “won” both his vice presidential debates against Sarah Palin in 2008 and Paul Ryan in 2012.

Yet what is remembered is Trump’s behaviour. He roamed about the stage and loomed threatening behind Hillary Clinton.

He invited her husband’s alleged ex-girlfriends to sit in the front row of the audience.

He called Biden “demented” before their first debate and abused him to his face, saying: “There’s nothing smart about you Joe.”

Trump refused to abide by the rules and talked over the moderator and Biden.

A senior White House correspondent summed up their first presidential debate as “a hot mess, inside a dumpster fire, inside a train wreck”.

Trump refused to take the required COVID test to take part and then developed it, resulting in the cancellation of their next scheduled debate.

At their final debate, a technician was employed to switch off the participants’ microphones except during their allotted speaking time.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump: ‘Biden can’t walk off a plane’

It is usually the underdog who issues the challenge to debate. Biden has been trailing narrowly in key opinion polls and needs the debates to demonstrate that he is still up to the job at the age of 81.

Read more:
Porn stars, sex scandals: The A to Z of Trump’s hush money trial
Trump: US seeks the whole truth – and nothing but the truth

Many observers think that the president is actually showing fewer signs of cognitive impairment than Trump, who is only four years younger and whose rally speeches are becoming increasingly incoherent rants.

When the two men debate this summer, Biden may well “beat” Trump again. But Trump’s antics could well dominate – and they certainly impress some voters.

The problems with the debates four years ago explain why neither side wants to put the commission in charge this time.

The Republicans have accused the CPD of bias and the Democrats blame it for not keeping order.

Significantly the first debate this year, on CNN, will be in a studio without a live audience for the first time in the US presidential history.

Both sides also wanted to have their encounters earlier in the summer because there is an increasing trend to vote earlier, with some states opening their polls as early as September.

Biden and Trump during a presidential debate in Nashville in 2020. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Biden and Trump during a presidential debate in Nashville in 2020. Pic: Reuters

The agreed debates will be head-to-heads between Biden and Trump, which suits them both because Robert F Kennedy Jnr is working flat out to get on enough state ballots to qualify for a CPD debate.

Polling suggests he would take votes from each of them and could have a decisive impact on who wins.

President Biden gift wrapped his debate invitation with the cheeky tag “I hear you are free on Wednesdays” because the criminal court where Trump is currently on trial does not sit on Wednesdays.

The dates they’ve agreed are actually a Tuesday and a Thursday but the dig still stands.

? Listen above then tap here to follow the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts ?

The first Biden-Trump debate in 2020 drew 71 million viewers in the US making it the third most-watched presidential debate behind only Trump and Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Ronald Reagan versus Jimmy Carter in 1980.

But average audiences for the debates are diminishing.

Nate Silver, a leading political statistician, points out they are one of the few fixed points in a campaign which can have some direct impact today when “almost nothing moves the polls these days because the candidates are so well known and everybody is so partisan”.

America’s news networks have found out that Trump drives up ratings, even when the station’s editorial policy opposes him.

CNN gave his rallies saturation coverage in 2016 and apologised more recently when Trump was allowed to monopolise a “town hall” on the channel.

Now the networks and their guest debaters have parted company with the protections provided by the CPD and its heavily regulated debates before live audiences on university campuses.

They will be under pressure to show they can provide fair and informative programmes for their viewers and not just entertainment.

The precedents for success are not good from the UK, where broadcasters abandoned working together following a rigid formula after 2010.

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

By competing against each other they effectively gave the whip hand to the politicians, who were free to withdraw or bestow their favours.

Since then the subsequent debate-style election programmes have not made a significant informative or influential impact on the campaigns. The viewers, a.k.a the electorate, have lost out.

This year the two people vying to be the leader of the free world are calling the shots on how they will debate.

It is hardly encouraging for democracy that a senior senator like Mitt Romney’s first comparison is with The Muppet Show.

[ad_2]

Source link

Categories
International

Everyone can see the football players but only those with 20/20 vision can spot the hidden ticket in under 45 seconds

[ad_1]

YOU are a true football fan with the eyes of a hawk if you can spot the hidden ticket in under 45 seconds in the latest illusion.

As the premier league is set to kick off the final match tomorrow, this football-themed image is bound to put anxious fans in the right mood.

Find the hidden ticket in this dynamic football scene in under 45 seconds

9

Find the hidden ticket in this dynamic football scene in under 45 secondsCredit: seatpic

The latest brainteaser features a dynamic football scene, packed with action and details.

Players wearing blue and red uniforms, whistles, footballs flying around, the referee and desired trophies all can be spotted within the image.

But hidden within the green grass is a ticket to the most-anticipated match.

And only those with the high IQ and a perfect vision can find it within the strictly allocated time.

more on optical illusions

So, grab your timer, set it to 45 seconds and off you go!

You need the eyes of an observant referee to spot the small ticket carefully camouflaged within the scene.

This mind-bending puzzle might come off unassuming at first.

But do not make a mistake of underestimating this brainteaser as it will leave you scratching your head.

Not only do you need the sharpest of eyes and the strongest of minds, but you’ll also need to remain composed throughout.

That’s because you’re more likely to make mistakes if you try and rush it, so make sure to check every square inch of the image.

Everyone can see a burning candle but you have a high IQ and 20/20 vision if you can spot the illusive cat in 6 seconds

But you still have to race against the clock as you’re given seven seconds to complete the task.

And with so much pressure to deal with, you’re going to have to be quick-witted if you’re to stand any chance of succeeding.

The artistic detailing that has gone into this illusion offers the perfect camouflage for the ticket, as your eyes find it hard to focus on any one object.

In fact, you’re likely to be left tearing your hair out as the pressure seeps in.

If you’d like some help, try breaking the image down into several sections. Then, search each section slowly, one at a time, from left to right.

Optical illusion benefits

RESEARCHERS have developed many tests that show how various brain regions react to optical illusions.

They are not only entertaining, but they also shed light on how our brains interpret visual data.

By giving your brain a little workout on a regular basis, you enhance your ability to focus and observe details.

Studies have shown, people who regularly challenge themselves with optical illusions and puzzles see big improvements in their problem-solving skills, concentration and attention.

Improved concentration and attention span, in turn, can help prevent cognitive decline in older age.

Psychologists at The University of Glasgow found that staring at an optical illusion can improve eyesight by allowing you to see small print.

Why not try other optical illusions while you scroll?

Puzzle fanatics have been loving this brainteaser which challenges you to find the hidden animal in the picture in just 11 seconds.

If that’s too easy, then try finding the leopard carefully camouflaged in this tricky image in just seven seconds.

Lastly, test your vision and IQ with this mind-bending puzzle as you attempt to uncover a giraffe without a twin.

Did you find the hidden ticket yet? If not, don’t worry, the answer is shown below.

We’ve added three bonus illusions for you to have a go at!

Did you spot the ticket?

9

Did you spot the ticket?Credit: seatpic
Find the winning ticket in under 15 seconds

9

Find the winning ticket in under 15 seconds
Right in the goal sits the winning ticket, meaning the fan who lost it is unlikely to have it returned

9

Right in the goal sits the winning ticket, meaning the fan who lost it is unlikely to have it returned
Can you find the missing wrapped sweet in under 49 seconds?

9

Can you find the missing wrapped sweet in under 49 seconds?
Did you manage to find the missing sweet?

9

Did you manage to find the missing sweet?
The purple wrapped sweet was hidden in plain sight

9

The purple wrapped sweet was hidden in plain sight
Can you see the hidden bee in this floral scene?

9

Can you see the hidden bee in this floral scene?
The bee was hidden in a yellow flower at the bottom of the image

9

The bee was hidden in a yellow flower at the bottom of the image

[ad_2]

Source link

Categories
International

The controversy over King Charles’ portrait : NPR

[ad_1]

The first portrait painted of King Charles since his coronation has some critics seeing red. NPR’s Danielle Kurtzleben discusses the controversy with art journalist Holly Black.



DANIELLE KURTZLEBEN, HOST:

The newest official portrait of King Charles has some critics seeing red. Actually, it has everybody seeing red. The nearly nine-foot portrait of the monarch features a lifelike depiction of his face, set against a backdrop of abstract reds swirling around and almost subsuming His Majesty. It’s an unconventional portrait, and people have lots of opinions about it. To tell us more about the painting and the response to it is London-based journalist Holly Black, contributor for Artnet News. Holly, welcome to ALL THINGS CONSIDERED.

HOLLY BLACK: Hello there. Thank you very much for having me.

KURTZLEBEN: OK, so a lot of listeners are likely familiar with the subject, King Charles, but probably less so with the artist who painted this piece, Jonathan Yeo. Maybe just start by telling us what he’s known for and how this portrait fits into his body of work.

BLACK: Yes. Of course. Well, he is actually very well known, and I think that his style is also quite well known as well. He’s known for, you know, very realistic portrayals of his sitters and this sort of slightly loose style that is usually surrounded by something that would traditionally maybe be called unfinished. So he is someone who’s very well known on the British art scene, I’d say, and probably that is quite at least visually familiar to a reasonably broad audience.

KURTZLEBEN: All right. Well, let’s get to this painting because there’s been a fair amount of criticism leveled at it. It’s been memed to death online. It’s the butt of a lot of jokes. But can you tell us what the art world’s reaction has been to this portrait?

BLACK: Yeah, I think it’s fair to say it’s – if you were putting it nicely, you would say mixed. And I would say probably it’s been a lot more on the controversial side, I think that one of the most interesting things is that nearly everyone has seen this portrait digitally. And that’s quite difficult because the sort of compression with this very deep, intense re – very bright red, actually. It’s not deep at all. It’s super bright, and it’s very in your face.

I think a lot of people just think it is too aggressive and it has too many colonial associations with the British Empire, ideas of blood, ideas of military and all these different things that maybe the monarchy doesn’t really want to be associated with. And I think from an art world perspective, there is a little bit of an eye roll being, you know, that everyone always wants to talk about royal portraits. And it’s almost an element of dismissal, saying this is obviously not a good painting, it’s not something that is particularly revolutionary and, yes, we don’t like it.

KURTZLEBEN: I’ve only seen it online. Most people have. What’s the difference seeing it in person?

BLACK: When you walk in and you see this portrait, it is actually a remarkable likeness of the king. And it does give a sense of an actual – an intimacy and a person. But I think that when you are viewing this image online – and it really goes to show how we actually consume images these days – is – the color looks very compressed. It looks very bright. And even when you stand in front of the portrait and you try and take a photo on your phone, it completely flattens it and heightens the color in a way that makes it look very peculiar.

KURTZLEBEN: You know, to zoom out here, a lot of art is not appreciated in its time. I know you know this. So I’m wondering, to you, is the backlash or at least part of the backlash to this painting simply because it’s different, or is there more to it than that?

BLACK: I think it’s worth saying that there is always a media circus with anything to do with the royal family…

KURTZLEBEN: Sure.

BLACK: …In the United Kingdom – and especially when it comes to royal portraits. I mean, as we well know, only a few weeks ago, we had this absolute media frenzy with regards to a photo of the Princess of Wales and her children. So I think that probably the most important thing to take away from it is – I personally don’t think that the controversy will last. I’m not sure whether it will be considered a great portrait of King Charles. I wouldn’t be surprised if, you know, people’s opinions soften with time, especially as more people see it in person. I wouldn’t be surprised if people sort of forget about it or don’t actually – it’s not going to be in the public consciousness for that long is probably a nicer way of putting it.

KURTZLEBEN: Yeah.

BLACK: You know, people will remember the controversy maybe and will maybe look on kinder eyes on the portrait itself as time goes on.

KURTZLEBEN: That’s journalist Holly Black, contributor for Artnet News. Holly, thank you so much.

BLACK: No problem. Thank you so much for having me.

Copyright © 2024 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

[ad_2]

Source link

Categories
International

Nawaz Sharif Accuses Imran Khan Of “Backstabbing” Him After Elections

[ad_1]

Nawaz Sharif Accuses Imran Khan Of 'Backstabbing' Him After Elections

Islamabad:

Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) supremo Nawaz Sharif accused Pakistan Tareek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan of ‘backstabbing’ him in 2013 by carrying out protest rallies despite assuring him of cooperation after elections, reported Dawn.

Addressing a meeting of the PML-N’s Central Working Committee (CWC) in Lahore, Nawaz said upon assuming power in 2013, he visited Imran at his residence in Banigala and they agreed on a working relationship for the country’s sake.

Nawaz further said Imran, thereafter, went to London along with other political leaders where a “plot was hatched” as per which protests were launched in the country upon the latter’s return, Dawn reported.

Nawaz said he was left befuddled by the development, adding that he should have been informed about the matter or whatever the PTI’s reservations were, according to the report.

“I visit you and you stab me in the back by assuring cooperation, and then you begin protests in Islamabad’s D-Chowk?” Dawn quoted Nawaz as saying.

He added that his cabinet also called for a crackdown on the protests by the police but he asked them to desist, Dawn reported.

The former PM added that it was a ‘matter of record’ that his government had not impeded the formation of the PTI government in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa after the 2013 elections, despite being in the position to do so through a coalition.

“We call for accountability of those who destroyed and ruined Pakistan,” the PML(N) chief said.

Urging the people to take a judgment call on which political party had served them the best, Nawaz said they should consider these aspects before casting their votes.

“I have the right to ask my nation this question: What do you think, before voting, about Nawaz Sharif’s performance was and what was that of his opponents?…the nation should answer this. I have a slight complaint with the nation as well. A prime minister is removed in a false case of not taking a salary from his son and the nation stays silent, this is not right,” the former PM said.

Addressing the meeting, Nawaz said false cases against the party were ‘exposed’.

Lauding the performance of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, he also predicted a turnaround in the country’s fortunes going forward, according to Dawn.

Speaking before him, the PM said he was at peace with stepping down as the PML(N) chief and wanted his brother to assume the party’s presidency.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

[ad_2]

Source link

Categories
International

US national security adviser, Saudi Arabia’s crown prince meet to discuss ‘semi-final’ security deal

[ad_1]

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — President Joe Biden’s national security adviser met early Sunday with Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to discuss what the kingdom described as the “semi-final” version of a wide-ranging security agreement between the countries.

The announcement by the state-run Saudi Press Agency comes as the strategic deal had been upended after Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack on Israel that killed 1,200 people and saw 250 others taken hostage back to the Gaza Strip.

In the time since, a punishing Israeli airstrike campaign and ground offensive there has killed over 35,000 Palestinians, endangering the security deal that had included Saudi Arabia diplomatically recognizing Israel for the first time since its founding in 1948.

Saudi state media released no images of Jake Sullivan and Prince Mohammed meeting in Dhahran, a city in the kingdom’s far east that’s home to its state-run oil giant, the Saudi Arabian Oil Co. known as Saudi Aramco.

“The semi-final version of the draft strategic agreements between the kingdom and the United States of America, which are almost being finalized — and what is being worked on between the two sides in the Palestinian issue to find a credible path — were discussed,” the statement released after the talks said.

That included “a two-state solution that meets the aspirations and legitimate rights of the Palestinian people” and “the situation in Gaza and the need to stop the war there and facilitate the entry of humanitarian aid,” the statement added.

Saudi Arabia has long called for an independent Palestinian state to be created along Israel’s 1967 borders, with east Jerusalem as its capital. However, that likely may be untenable for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whose government hinges on support from hard-liners who oppose a two-state solution and support Israeli settlements on lands Palestinians want for that state.

The White House had acknowledged Sullivan’s trip and that he would later head on to Israel. However, there was no immediate statement from the U.S. on the discussions, other than to say they would be “including the war in Gaza and ongoing efforts to achieve a lasting peace and security in the region.”

Saudi Arabia has long relied — like other Gulf Arab nations — on the U.S. to be the security guarantor for the wider Middle East as tensions over Iran’s nuclear program in recent years have spilled over into a series of attacks. The proposal now being discussed likely would deepen that, and also reportedly includes access to advanced weapons and possibly trade deals as well.

Saudi Arabia has also pushed for nuclear cooperation in the deal that includes America allowing it to enrich uranium in the kingdom — something that worries nonproliferation experts, as spinning centrifuges opens the door to a possible weapons program. Prince Mohammed has said the kingdom would pursue a nuclear weapon if Iran had one. Iran in recent weeks has increasingly threatened it could do so.

[ad_2]

Source link

Categories
International

Richemont shares climb 6% on record full-year sales, new CEO

[ad_1]

Shoppers line up to enter a Cartier store on Canton Road in the Tsim Sha Tsui area of Hong Kong.

Billy H.C. Kwok | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Shares of Swiss luxury group Richemont climbed as much as 6.3% Friday after the company reported record full-year sales, even as Asia-Pacific spending waned.

The Cartier owner said group sales rose 3% at actual exchange rates to an all-time high of 20.6 billion euros, or $22.38 billion, in the financial year ending in March, despite a weakening outlook for luxury brands.

Shares pared gains slightly after market open to trade up 4.9% by 10:00 a.m. London time.

Fiscal fourth-quarter sales fell 1% to 4.8 billion euros, or $5.21 billion, at actual rates, driven by a slowdown in Asia-Pacific.

“We experienced a softening of sales in the fourth quarter in Asia Pacific against challenging comparatives, which was more than offset by higher growth in all the other regions. As we predicted, a sustainable rebound in Chinese demand would take some time,” chairman Johann Rupert said in a statement.

Shares of Cartier owner Richemont rise after full-year results

In a separate statement, the company announced Nicolas Bos, CEO of Van Cleef & Arpels, as its new group CEO, effective June 1.

The luxury sector has been under pressure since late 2023, as tough macroeconomic and geopolitical conditions have weighed on consumer spending, particularly in China.

Other luxury stocks LVMH, Kering and Christian Dior were seen trading lower Friday morning.

Kering, one of the biggest casualties of the luxury slowdown, warned in April that it expects a sharp downturn in first-half profits amid waning demand for its Gucci brand among once big-spending Asia-Pacific shoppers.

[ad_2]

Source link

Categories
International

Slovak PM’s condition ‘remains very serious’ – deputy — RT World News

[ad_1]

Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico remains in serious condition after surviving an assassination attempt, his deputy Robert Kalinak said on Saturday. 

Fico was attacked on Wednesday in the central Slovak city of Handlova. When he approached a group of spectators, one person pulled out a handgun and shot the politician multiple times at close range. Fico was immediately rushed to the hospital, and the assailant was detained on the spot. 

Kalinak, who also serves as defense minister, spoke to the news channel TA3 outside the Roosevelt Hospital in Banska Bystrica, where Fico is being treated. He remained cautiously optimistic about the prime minister’s recovery. 

“He is in stable condition, but the four gunshot wounds have caused extensive injuries,” Kalinak said. He added that Fico had undergone additional surgery, and that there still could be complications. “In any case, his condition is very serious.”


‘No country should be punished for its sovereignty’ – Fico in quotes

Kalinak said that he had a brief conversation with the prime minister in the hospital, and thanked the doctors and the Slovak public to their support. “I ask everyone for a little bit more patience and a strong belief that everything will turn from bad to good,” he said. 

The authorities identified the suspect as a 71-year-old former security guard named Juraj Cintula. He was placed in pre-detention on Saturday. 

Although the suspect’s exact motives remain unclear, the government believes that the attack was politically motivated. Many leading politicians have linked the assassination attempt to “hateful rhetoric” and the politically charged climate in the country.

Fico is a polarizing figure in the EU due to his position regarding the conflict in Ukraine. The politician has repeatedly urged against further escalation with Russia and suspended the deliveries of weapons to Kiev.

You can share this story on social media:

[ad_2]

Source link

Categories
International

Elon Musk to launch Starlink satellite internet service in Bali

[ad_1]

NEW DELHI: Elon Musk, the billionaire entrepreneur behind Tesla, SpaceX, and social media platform X, landed in Bali, Indonesia on Sunday to inaugurate the Starlink satellite internet service in the world’s largest archipelagic nation.
The launch ceremony is set to take place at a public health clinic in Denpasar, the capital of Bali, with Indonesian President Joko Widodo in attendance.Musk will also sign an agreement aimed at improving connectivity in Indonesia’s health and education sectors, according to Luhut Binsar Pandjaitan, the country’s Coordinating Minister of Maritime and Investment, who greeted Musk upon his arrival.
Indonesia, with its population of over 270 million spread across 17,000 islands and three time zones, faces challenges in providing high-speed internet access to its remote regions. “Our remote regions need Starlink to expand high-speed internet services, especially to help with problems in the health, education and maritime sectors,” Pandjaitan stated.
Local internet providers, relying on base transceiver stations, struggle to reach outer islands due to limited coverage. Starlink’s low-orbit satellites are expected to deliver faster internet speeds with nationwide coverage, as explained by Communication and Informatics Minister Budi Arie Setiadi.
During his visit, Musk is also scheduled to attend the 10th World Water Forum, which focuses on addressing global water and sanitation challenges. This marks Musk’s first in-person visit to Bali, following his virtual participation in the B-20 business forum in 2022, shortly after his highly publicized acquisition of Twitter.
Musk’s visit comes on the heels of recent visits by Apple CEO Tim Cook and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, who expressed interest in manufacturing and investing in Indonesia’s digital infrastructure, respectively. These developments align with Indonesia’s Golden Indonesia 2045 Vision, which aims to position the country among the world’s top five economies by its centennial anniversary of independence.



[ad_2]

Source link

Categories
International

Israel refutes South Africa’s accusations at UN world court — Global Issues

[ad_1]

Linked to South Africa’s ongoing case accusing Israel of violating its obligations under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (the Genocide Convention), the new request, filed on 10 May, asked the ICJ to order Israel to “immediately withdraw and cease its military operations in the Rafah governate”.

Israel Oral Argument: Genocide in Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel) | Int’l Court of Justice

An ‘obscene exploitation’

Appearing before the Court, Gilad Noam, co-agent of Israel, refuted South Africa’s claims, terming it an “obscene exploitation” of the “most sacred” Genocide Convention.

“South Africa presents the Court yet again for the fourth time within the scope of less than five months, with a picture that is completely divorced from the facts and circumstances.”

He stated that Israel is engaged in a “difficult and tragic” armed conflict, a fact essential to “comprehend the situation” but one that is ignored by South Africa.

“It makes a mockery of the heinous charge of genocide … facts matter and truth should matter. Words must retain their meaning. Calling something a genocide again and again does not make it genocide,” he added.

Israel did not start the war

Mr. Noam further stated that it was not Israel that started the war, recalling the “horrific onslaught” on 7 October 2023 by Hamas and other Palestinian groups targeting Israeli civilians and communities, killing over 1,200 and taking 254 women, men and children hostage.

He added that Hamas and other terrorist groups in Gaza continue to attack Israel, displacing communities and destroying homes and infrastructure. Moreover, Hamas continues to use Palestinian civilians as human shields.

“Rafah, in particular, is a focal point for the ongoing terrorist activity,” he said, accusing Hamas of having “intricate underground tunnel infrastructure” with command-and-control rooms, military equipment, and potentially for smuggling Israeli hostages out of Gaza.

He also noted that even though the ICJ called for the immediate release of the hostages, they remain under captivity.

Not a large-scale operation

“The reality is that any State put in Israel’s difficult position would do the same. The right of defence against the brutality of the Hamas terrorist organization cannot be in doubt. It is an inherent right afforded to Israel, as it is to any State,” Mr. Noam said.

The Israeli representative stated his country’s commitment to protecting itself, “in accordance with the law, which is why it has worked diligently to enable the protection of civilians, even as Hamas seeks deliberately to endanger them.”

“That is why there has not been a large-scale assault on Rafah, but rather specific, limited and localized operations prefaced with evacuation efforts and support for humanitarian activities,” he added.

Fully and sincerely engaged

Concluding his statement, Mr. Noam cited the Court’s rejection of South Africa’s earlier requests for similar provisional measures, and added that it would be “wholly inappropriate” to grant a provisional measure under such terms.

“South Africa has not given sufficient reason why the Court should now deviate from or essentially duplicate its earlier decisions,” he said, noting that Israel is “engaged fully and sincerely” in the proceedings, “despite the outrageous and libelous claims levelled against it.”

“[Israel] has made clear time and again its unwavering commitment to its obligations under its international law. It has done this while the fighting continues and its citizens are still under attack,” he said.

[ad_2]

Source link

Categories
International

Oleksandr Usyk beats Tyson Fury to become undisputed heavyweight champion | Boxing News

[ad_1]

Ukraine’s Usyk beat UK’s’s Fury by split decision to become the first unifying title fighter since 1999.

Oleksandr Usyk beat Tyson Fury by scoring a razor-thin split decision to win the world’s first undisputed heavyweight championship in 25 years, an unprecedented feat in boxing’s four-belt era.

The United Kingdom’s Fury was the early aggressor but Usyk gradually took charge and the “Gypsy King” was saved by the bell in the ninth round before slumping to his first career defeat on Sunday.

“It’s a great time. It’s a great day,” Usyk said.

Ukraine’s Usyk joins the likes of Muhammad Ali, Joe Louis and Mike Tyson as the undisputed heavyweight champion, the first since boxing recognised four major belts in the 2000s.

With the win, the former undisputed cruiserweight champion can legitimately claim to be the best of this era, although a rematch expected in October could provide another twist.

Tyson Fury vs Oleksandr Usyk [Andrew Couldridge/Action Images via Reuters]
Oleksandr Usyk celebrates with the belts after winning the fight to become the undisputed heavyweight world champion [Andrew Couldridge/Action Images via Reuters]

The UK’s Lennox Lewis was the last man to unify the heavyweight belts – three at the time – after beating Evander Holyfield in 1999.

Usyk got the better of the opening rounds before Fury hit his stride in the fourth, engaging in some showmanship as he started to catch Usyk with vicious body shots, but the Ukrainian battled back with several stinging reminders of his power.

Usyk turned the tide in the eighth round and few would have been surprised had the referee stopped the fight in the ninth as the Ukrainian’s powerful punches to the head left Fury reeling.

Usyk hurt Fury (34-1-1) with a left hand and eventually sent him sprawling into a corner in the final seconds of the round, getting credit for a knockdown right before Fury was saved by the bell. Fury struggled to mount a consistent attack after nearly getting stopped, and the knockdown turned out to be the decisive factor in the decision.

“Thank you so much to my team,” Usyk said while fighting back tears in the ring after the win.

“It’s a big opportunity for me, for my family, for my country. Slava Ukraini!”

Tyson Fury v Oleksandr Usyk
Oleksandr Usyk celebrates [Andrew Couldridge/Action Images via Reuters]

Fury wants rematch

Fury kissed Usyk on the head after the final bell. Fury also said he wants the rematch in October.

“I believe I won that fight,” Fury said. “I believe he won a few of the rounds, but I won the majority of them, and I believe it was one of those what-can-you-do, one of them … decisions in boxing. We both put on a good fight, best we can do.

“You know, his country is at war, so people are siding with a country at war. But make no mistake, I won that fight, in my opinion, and I’ll be back. I’ve got a rematch clause.”

Usyk landed 41 percent of his 407 punches, while Fury landed just 31.7 percent of his 496 punches, according to CompuBox statistics. Usyk both threw (260 to 210) and landed (122 to 95) more power punches.

Usyk has now joined the elite club of fighters who held every major world championship belt at heavyweight – and he is the first to do it in the four-belt era, which began in 2007. The list of undisputed champions includes Jack Dempsey, Joe Louis, Floyd Patterson, Muhammad Ali, Joe Frazier and Mike Tyson.

Tyson Fury vs Oleksandr Usyk [Andrew Couldridge/Action Images via Reuters]
Tyson Fury with Oleksandr Usyk after losing their fight [Andrew Couldridge/Action Images via Reuters]

Stars line up at ring side

Wladimir Klitschko was among the legends watching along with Saudi-based football stars Cristiano Ronaldo and Neymar.

Riyadh’s newly built, 22,000-capacity Kingdom Arena was packed when Usyk strode out for his ringwalk at 1:30am (22:30 GMT) wearing a green cossack coat and fur hat.

Fury followed, dancing to Barry White and Bonny Tyler’s “Holding out for a Hero” in a green sleeveless jacket and back-to-front baseball cap.

It set the stage for a clash of two fighters with impeccable pedigrees and very different approaches to the sport.

In the co-main event, Australia’s Jai Opetaia won a unanimous decision over Mairis Briedis of Latvia to win the vacant IBF cruiserweight title. Meanwhile, Ireland’s Anthony Cacace scored a TKO win over Joe Cordina of Wales to retain his IBO super-featherweight title and claim the IBF belt.

Tyson Fury v Oleksandr Usyk -
Anthony Joshua and Cristiano Ronaldo at of the fight [Andrew Couldridge/Action Images]

[ad_2]

Source link