Manhattan Court Denies FIFA Subsidiaries’ Bid to Block UEFA Evidence Request
GENEVA (AP) — A Manhattan judge dismissed on Thursday the requests from FIFA subsidiaries aimed at obstructing the European soccer organization UEFA in its pursuit of evidence regarding Gianni Infantino’s failed plan for private investment in the World Cup.
UEFA’s Strategy Against Infantino
As part of a broader initiative to oust Infantino from his position as FIFA president, UEFA submitted court documents in August, potentially culminating in a criminal complaint against him in Switzerland for alleged financial mismanagement.
Evidence Discovery from Investment Firms
UEFA’s legal team is seeking access to documents from Joshua Kushner’s investment company Thrive and FIFA advisors JP Morgan concerning a controversial sell-off plan from July that ignited significant unrest in the global soccer community.
Court Ruling Details
During proceedings at a Manhattan district court, motions to intervene filed by two FIFA subsidiaries were denied. The judge concluded that these entities “do not have a direct, substantial, and legally protectable interest” in the case, according to Judge Jeannette Vargas’s ruling.
“Nothing in this record indicates that the US FIFA parties, or even FIFA itself, will be parties in the contemplated criminal proceedings,” Judge Vargas stated in her eight-page ruling, which was obtained by The Associated Press.
FIFA’s Response to the Ruling
FIFA clarified that the ruling was specific to its subsidiaries known as “FIFA (AMERICAS) INC.” and “FWC2026 US, INC.” The organization noted that the court did not evaluate the merits of UEFA’s application, and as such, no documents are required to be produced at this time.
Investor Representation
Kushner’s firm, Thrive, has reportedly engaged high-profile attorney Alex Spiro, known for representing Elon Musk in significant legal matters, to handle the proceedings initiated by UEFA.
Upcoming Re-election for Infantino Amid Fallout
The voiding of the private investment plan—abandoned within days following a global outcry—has become the most challenging crisis of Infantino’s nearly 11-year tenure as FIFA president. He is expected to stand for re-election in March and will undergo an eligibility and integrity assessment by a FIFA-selected panel.
Details of the Abandoned Investment Plan
Thrive was poised to serve as the primary investor in the clandestine initiative known as FIFA Forward Enterprise, which sought to provide FIFA with $4.2 billion for more than a 20% equity stake in the subsidiary overseeing the organization’s tournaments, including the World Cup.
The 211 FIFA member federations were each offered $20 million to endorse the initiative. FIFA’s reserves have ballooned to over $5 billion following the conclusion of the men’s World Cup, co-hosted by the U.S., Canada, and Mexico, in July.
Allegations of Harassment Against Infantino
UEFA has initiated discovery requests in various jurisdictions, while FIFA categorized these legal actions as harassment against Infantino in a September filing in Florida, where the organization maintains its office in a Miami suburb.
Election Challenge on the Horizon
Infantino is now facing at least one challenger in the forthcoming elections: veteran Japanese official Kohzo Tashima, who has been part of FIFA’s ruling council since 2016. The deadline for candidate submissions is set for next Wednesday. UEFA is also anticipated to nominate another candidate, with hopes of persuading Arsène Wenger, FIFA’s head of global development and former Arsenal coach, to oppose Infantino.
Discussion about this post