The attack in Trappes and La Verrière calls first for compassion towards the victims and their families. It also requires democratic restraint. While justice must establish individual responsibility, public debate must resist collective blame. Free expression remains essential, but citizens, media and political leaders share responsibility for distinguishing facts from fear and people from stereotypes. Education and critical judgment are indispensable safeguards against hatred, division and the exploitation of human suffering. This responsibility concerns public institutions and every citizen alike.
Compassion comes before commentary
Our first thoughts are with the person killed, the people injured, their families and all those who witnessed the shootings in Trappes and La Verrière. Among those injured is a twelve year old child. Their suffering must not become material for political competition.
According to information available on 24 October, one man was killed and five people were injured on 23 October. French anti terrorism prosecutors have opened an investigation that includes the circumstance that the acts were committed because of the victims’ real or supposed belonging to a race, ethnicity, nation or religion. The suspect is in custody.
It would therefore be irresponsible to attribute this crime to a political party, a broadcaster, a writer or a community without evidence. The investigation must establish the facts and criminal responsibility must be assessed individually. This restraint is not a refusal to examine the wider public climate. It is the starting point for doing so honestly.
Free expression does not abolish public responsibility
Democracies must allow robust debate about violence, immigration, security, religion and national identity. Freedom of expression protects opinions that may disturb or alarm us. It does not, however, require citizens to suspend their judgment about how public claims are formulated.
When acts committed by individuals become supposed characteristics of entire ethnic or religious groups, something fundamental changes. Evidence gives way to identity. A criminal is treated as a representative and a neighbour becomes a suspect. People described as a collective threat may experience fear or resentment, while those encouraged to fear them may become still more convinced that peaceful coexistence is impossible.
No one should claim that this sequence explains the Trappes attack without proof. Yet we can recognise its social cost without making such a claim. Collective blame narrows our moral vision. It makes every community feel less secure and every subsequent crime easier to exploit.
Education is a democratic safeguard
At the side event that we organised during the recent OSCE Warsaw Human Dimension Conference, we discussed racism, xenophobia and Islamophobia through accountability and human rights. The same principle applies here: individual conduct must be examined individually, while every person deserves equal protection.
Education for democracy cannot mean teaching citizens what they should think. It must help all of us distinguish fact from rumour, a person from a category, criticism of ideas from degradation of people. Media literacy, religious literacy, historical knowledge and genuine encounters across communal boundaries will not prevent every act of violence. They can, however, strengthen our resistance to manipulation.
Justice must address the attack. Public institutions must protect every person equally. All of us can refuse to let grief be turned into collective suspicion. This is not naivety about violence. It is how a democracy defends both security and human dignity.
Discussion about this post