If you recall, Donald Trump assured us that upon “investigating the investigators,” we’d learn the truth about a giant “deep state” conspiracy against him, starting with the Obama administration, egged on by the Clinton campaign, and it would dwarf any finding made by the Mueller investigation. Now, three years later, investigating the investigators led to a finding that, for the most part, people did things by the book.
According to the New York Times:
Mr. Durham and his team are working to complete a final report by the end of the year, they said, and one of the lead prosecutors on his team is leaving for a job with a prominent law firm.
Over the course of his inquiry, Mr. Durham has developed cases against two people accused of lying to the F.B.I. in relation to outside efforts to investigate purported Trump-Russia ties, but he has not charged any conspiracy or put any high-level officials on trial. The recent developments suggest that the chances of any more indictments are remote.
The finding is not the sweeping criminal enterprise we were promised by the people who claim that “Russia, Russia, Russia” is and was a hoax. Additionally, this probe went on much longer than the Mueller investigation. Of course, perhaps only Trump actually expected the investigation to find anything beyond criminal hyperbole in a couple of witnesses. But the idea of punishing those who investigated Trump, the “investigate the investigators,” is sure to become Republican doctrine from this point out. We have already been promised as much regarding the January 6th Committee if the Republicans take the House.
After Mr. Durham’s team completes its report, it will be up to Attorney General Merrick B. Garland to decide whether to make its findings public. The report will be Mr. Durham’s opportunity to present any evidence or conclusions that challenge the Justice Department’s basis for opening the investigation in 2016 into the links between Mr. Trump and Russia.
Given the number of investigations that Garland has going on into the Trump administration and Trump himself, it is a safe bet that Garland will release the report. To the extent that it contains any embarrassing information, so be it. It helps buttress DOJ’s integrity and transparency, two commodities that will serve it well in the near future. An ability to point to transparency regarding failures will give DOJ’s assertions and possible accusations that much more weight.
But from the very beginning, many people suspected that the motivation going into this “investigation” of the “investigators” was punishment for putting Trump’s campaign through such close examination. The fear now is that it will be a pro forma Republican response to any investigation initiated by Democrats. To the extent the Durham investigation found little, it guards against the use of that tactic.
@JasonMiciak believes a day without learning is a day not lived. He is a political writer, features writer, author, and attorney. He is a Canadian-born dual citizen who spent his teen and college years in the Pacific Northwest and has since lived in seven states. He now enjoys life as a single dad of a young girl, writing from the beaches of the Gulf Coast. He loves crafting his flower pots, cooking, and currently studies philosophy of science, religion, and non-math principles behind quantum mechanics and cosmology. Please feel free to contact for speaking engagements or any concerns.
Discussion about this post