[ad_1]
“SUSPICIONS”
Royal-supporting tabloids would normally have “waited for it to blow over”, Laura Clancy, lecturer in media at Lancaster University, told AFP.
Other outlets have also often been reluctant to dip into royal controversy over fear they could lose access, she added.
But the rise of social media now means that “people can question and talk about it and there’s news outlets around the world who don’t stick to that line”.
In the digital media age, “any manipulation of an image, even relatively minor edits done with no intention to mislead, can raise suspicions”, Chris Morris, chief executive of fact-checking service Full Fact, said in a comment sent to AFP.
Part of the problem is that the family distributes pictures from self-described “amateur photographer” Catherine for use by professional media outlets, which have strict rules on using manipulated images.
While there have been calls to use professionals, “there are some … individuals whose brand is based on authenticity”, explained Hannah Perry, lead digital researcher at the London-based think tank Demos.
But royals must weigh that up against the fact that “trust is so low in public institutions and we know that people are becoming incredibly sceptical and also savvy” about analysing information, she added.
“The best-case scenario in that situation would be to be transparent,” suggested Perry.
On the streets of London, public reaction was mixed.
[ad_2]
Source link